<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Epistemology Archives - Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/scybernetics-category/epistemology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/scybernetics-category/epistemology/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Executive Summary The content of this article was generated with the help of a LLM (NotebookLM) from the analysis of the videos, so please check the sources for a more accurate analysis. This document synthesizes the core themes, arguments, and conclusions from the Mind &#38; Life Institute&#8217;s &#8220;Minds, Artificial Intelligence, and Ethics&#8221; dialogue (10/2025). &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Functionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reductionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract: This article discuss the epistemology of modeling and simulations, positioning them not merely as descriptive tools, but as crucial heuristic devices and active epistemological practices central to developing a comprehensive, enacted approach to cognition and self-understanding. This focus is situated within the larger framework of Second-Order Rationality² and the integration of first-person (1P) &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organology and Its Critiques: From Aristotle to Stiegler, Hui, and Rigon</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/organology-and-its-critiques-from-aristotle-to-stiegler-hui-and-rigon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> Abstract This article explores the evolving concept of organology, tracing its philosophical journey from Aristotle’s foundational ideas through Bernard Stiegler’s general organology and Yuk Hui’s cosmotechnics, culminating in Christophe Rigon’s scybernethic critique of scientific &#8220;anthropo-functionalism.&#8221; By examining how each thinker redefines the relationship between biological, technical, and social organs, the article highlights the importance &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/organology-and-its-critiques-from-aristotle-to-stiegler-hui-and-rigon/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Organology and Its Critiques: From Aristotle to Stiegler, Hui, and Rigon"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computationalPhenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract This short article synthesizes a philosophical and scientific dialogue bridging phenomenology, ecological psychology, enactive cognitive science, and formal neural modeling with key conceptual articulations. We examine how Merleau-Ponty’s concept of motor intentionality—the pre-reflective, embodied orientation of the subject toward the world—reconfigures the movement/consciousness relation, aligns with Gibson’s affordance theory, and finds computational resonance &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring Scyberspace: A New Framework for Cognition, Mathematics, and Ethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/exploring-scyberspace-a-new-framework-for-cognition-mathematics-and-ethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CognitiveScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In this article, we explore the concept of scyberspace, a novel representational framework that integrates first-person and third-person epistemologies to study cognition, meaning-making, and recursive dynamics. Drawing inspiration from diverse fields such as geometry, topology, enactivism, and computational paradigms, scyberspace offers a powerful tool for bridging classical and modern approaches to understanding cognition. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/exploring-scyberspace-a-new-framework-for-cognition-mathematics-and-ethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Exploring Scyberspace: A New Framework for Cognition, Mathematics, and Ethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scybernethics and Second-Order Rationality: Transcending the Natural Attitude</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-and-second-order-rationality-transcending-the-natural-attitude/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 10:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In the evolving landscape of cognitive science, Christophe Rigon&#8217;s concept of &#8220;second-order rationality&#8221; within the framework of scybernethics offers a fresh perspective on cognition and its relationship to the world. This article explores how Rigon&#8217;s second-order rationality differs from traditional first-order rationality, while integrating the three key paradigms of cognitive science: cognitivism, connectionism, &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-and-second-order-rationality-transcending-the-natural-attitude/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Scybernethics and Second-Order Rationality: Transcending the Natural Attitude"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toward an Embodied Pharmakological Path</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/toward-embodied-pharmakological-path-synthetic-take-projection-analysis-current-global-situation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Rigon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[06/10/2023, My synthetic analysis, take / projection of the current global noologic (related to the study of the mind or the way we think) situation. A standpoint. From a thread initially published on my Twitter account, so it is a very condensed expression. &#8220;It is an hypomnemata (a techniques of memory whose meaning Foucault analyzed &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/toward-embodied-pharmakological-path-synthetic-take-projection-analysis-current-global-situation/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Toward an Embodied Pharmakological Path"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas &#8211; Varela F. J. (1989)</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/whence-perceptual-meaning-a-cartography-of-current-ideas-varela-f-j-1992/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Rigon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 10:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CognitiveScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varela]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=47946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Varela F. J. (1991) Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas. In: Varela F. J. &#38; Dupuy J. P. (eds.) Understanding origins: Contemporary ideas on the origin of life, mind and society. Kluwer, Boston: 235–263. Available at https://cepa.info/2074 (free inscription, excellent knowledge base about enaction and alternative approaches to cognition). Also published as a &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/whence-perceptual-meaning-a-cartography-of-current-ideas-varela-f-j-1992/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas &#8211; Varela F. J. (1989)"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring the Future of Rationality at the Age of ChatGPT</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/exploring-future-rationality-age-chatgpt-enaction-functionalism-mechanization-mind/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Rigon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CogSciTechs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mechanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=47787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A conversation with ChatGPT4 about cognitive functionalism, mechanical thinking, the enactive paradigm and their systemic implications both on our world and on our common rationality. “We succeeded, and we failed, for exactly the same reason, namely our mode of rationality.” J. A. Wojciechowski. The deep civilizational roots of functionalism and mechanical thinking Me: &#8220;Explain the &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/exploring-future-rationality-age-chatgpt-enaction-functionalism-mechanization-mind/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Exploring the Future of Rationality at the Age of ChatGPT"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
