<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Automatic Scientist &#8211; A Short-Circuit of Understanding</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/the-automatic-scientist-a-short-circuit-of-understanding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> In May 2026, two simultaneous papers in Nature announced the arrival of the &#8220;automatic scientist&#8221; — multi-agent AI systems capable of formulating hypotheses, designing protocols, and analysing data with minimal human supervision. Co-Scientist (Google/Stanford) reproduced in days a hypothesis that had eluded human researchers for nearly a decade. Robin (FutureHouse) cut drug discovery time &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/the-automatic-scientist-a-short-circuit-of-understanding/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Automatic Scientist &#8211; A Short-Circuit of Understanding"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Concept of Proletarianisation in the Age of AI</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/on-the-concept-of-proletarianisation-in-the-age-of-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> Abstract: This article traces the evolution of the concept of proletarianisation from its Marxist origins through Bernard Stiegler&#8217;s cognitive extension to its Scybernethical reformulation. We argue that proletarianisation is not merely economic exploitation but a fundamental anthropological process: the loss of knowledge — know-how and know-thinking — produced by the externalisation of human capacities &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/on-the-concept-of-proletarianisation-in-the-age-of-ai/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "On the Concept of Proletarianisation in the Age of AI"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI Machines &#038; Recursivity</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Auto-research, Meta-harness, and the New Universal Grammar of Optimization From machines that speak to machines that do First there was the machine that speaks.The spectacle of a disembodied LLM voice, fluent and compliant, answering everything and nothing in the same tone. Now we have entered the age of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI Machines &#38; Recursivity"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inventing Scybernethics: A Lived Narrative of Individuation, Enactive Rationality, and Technological Hermeneutics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/inventing-scybernethics-a-lived-narrative-of-individuation-enactive-rationality-and-technological-hermeneutics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myself_soto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypomnemata]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> (Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Introduction The concept of invention is traditionally interpreted as the act of bringing forth something new—be it a tool, theory, system, or paradigm. However, within the deep waters of contemporary philosophy of individuation, and especially through the lens of Gilbert Simondon, invention is recast as a process &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/inventing-scybernethics-a-lived-narrative-of-individuation-enactive-rationality-and-technological-hermeneutics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Inventing Scybernethics: A Lived Narrative of Individuation, Enactive Rationality, and Technological Hermeneutics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scybernethics: Blueprints for Collective Autonomy and Digital Democracy</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-blueprints-for-collective-autonomy-and-digital-democracy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 10:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Watt centrifugal regulator (&#8220;governor&#8221;, cf. etymology of &#8220;cybernetics&#8221;by A-M Ampère, 1843) °°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The assertion that Scybernethics offers the specifications—the design patterns—for the digital tools and reflexive practices necessary for modern society to sustain its collective autonomy against forces of control and cognitive dependency can be explained and &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-blueprints-for-collective-autonomy-and-digital-democracy/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Scybernethics: Blueprints for Collective Autonomy and Digital Democracy"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power, Care and Democratic Enaction &#8211; A Scybernethics Proposal</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/power-care-and-democratic-enaction-a-scybernethics-proposal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) °°°°~x§x-&#60;@> Introduction In the face of today’s multi-scalar crises—social, ecological, epistemic—the urgent call for interdisciplinary dialogue is clearer than ever. The conference “Power and Care: Enactive Approaches and Critical Social Philosophy,” (27th-31st May 2026, convened by Mind &#38; Life Europe and hosted by Universitat Pompeu Fabra), signals precisely &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/power-care-and-democratic-enaction-a-scybernethics-proposal/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Power, Care and Democratic Enaction &#8211; A Scybernethics Proposal"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Executive Summary The content of this article was generated with the help of a LLM (NotebookLM) from the analysis of the videos, so please check the sources for a more accurate analysis. This document synthesizes the core themes, arguments, and conclusions from the Mind &#38; Life Institute&#8217;s &#8220;Minds, Artificial Intelligence, and Ethics&#8221; dialogue (10/2025). &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI, Enactment, and Democratic Self-Governance</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/ai-enactment-and-democratic-self-governance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MachineLearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The application of new AI technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) and machine learning (ML), to strengthen democracy must be carefully scrutinized through the lens of Ezequiel Di Paolo&#8217;s enactive philosophy and Barbara Stiegler&#8217;s critique of expertocracy, as these thinkers challenge the foundational computational and elitist assumptions often underlying such technologies. Based &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/ai-enactment-and-democratic-self-governance/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI, Enactment, and Democratic Self-Governance"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Functionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reductionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract: This article discuss the epistemology of modeling and simulations, positioning them not merely as descriptive tools, but as crucial heuristic devices and active epistemological practices central to developing a comprehensive, enacted approach to cognition and self-understanding. This focus is situated within the larger framework of Second-Order Rationality² and the integration of first-person (1P) &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; For a long time, the dominant metaphor for the mind has been that of a computer—a complex information processor housed inside the skull, receiving inputs from the senses and producing behavioral outputs. This image of a &#8220;brain in a vat&#8221; has shaped not only science fiction but also much of our everyday thinking about &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
