<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>AI Machines &#038; Recursivity</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Auto-research, Meta-harness, and the New Universal Grammar of Optimization From machines that speak to machines that do First there was the machine that speaks.The spectacle of a disembodied LLM voice, fluent and compliant, answering everything and nothing in the same tone. Now we have entered the age of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI Machines &#38; Recursivity"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inventing Scybernethics: A Lived Narrative of Individuation, Enactive Rationality, and Technological Hermeneutics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/inventing-scybernethics-a-lived-narrative-of-individuation-enactive-rationality-and-technological-hermeneutics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myself_soto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypomnemata]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> (Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Introduction The concept of invention is traditionally interpreted as the act of bringing forth something new—be it a tool, theory, system, or paradigm. However, within the deep waters of contemporary philosophy of individuation, and especially through the lens of Gilbert Simondon, invention is recast as a process &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/inventing-scybernethics-a-lived-narrative-of-individuation-enactive-rationality-and-technological-hermeneutics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Inventing Scybernethics: A Lived Narrative of Individuation, Enactive Rationality, and Technological Hermeneutics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scybernethics: Blueprints for Collective Autonomy and Digital Democracy</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-blueprints-for-collective-autonomy-and-digital-democracy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 10:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Watt centrifugal regulator (&#8220;governor&#8221;, cf. etymology of &#8220;cybernetics&#8221;by A-M Ampère, 1843) °°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The assertion that Scybernethics offers the specifications—the design patterns—for the digital tools and reflexive practices necessary for modern society to sustain its collective autonomy against forces of control and cognitive dependency can be explained and &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/scybernethics-blueprints-for-collective-autonomy-and-digital-democracy/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Scybernethics: Blueprints for Collective Autonomy and Digital Democracy"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power, Care and Democratic Enaction &#8211; A Scybernethics Proposal</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/power-care-and-democratic-enaction-a-scybernethics-proposal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) °°°°~x§x-&#60;@> Introduction In the face of today’s multi-scalar crises—social, ecological, epistemic—the urgent call for interdisciplinary dialogue is clearer than ever. The conference “Power and Care: Enactive Approaches and Critical Social Philosophy,” (27th-31st May 2026, convened by Mind &#38; Life Europe and hosted by Universitat Pompeu Fabra), signals precisely &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/power-care-and-democratic-enaction-a-scybernethics-proposal/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Power, Care and Democratic Enaction &#8211; A Scybernethics Proposal"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Executive Summary The content of this article was generated with the help of a LLM (NotebookLM) from the analysis of the videos, so please check the sources for a more accurate analysis. This document synthesizes the core themes, arguments, and conclusions from the Mind &#38; Life Institute&#8217;s &#8220;Minds, Artificial Intelligence, and Ethics&#8221; dialogue (10/2025). &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/minds-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-a-synthesis-of-the-dialogue/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI, Vulnerability, and Human Relationships"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI, Enactment, and Democratic Self-Governance</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/ai-enactment-and-democratic-self-governance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MachineLearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The application of new AI technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) and machine learning (ML), to strengthen democracy must be carefully scrutinized through the lens of Ezequiel Di Paolo&#8217;s enactive philosophy and Barbara Stiegler&#8217;s critique of expertocracy, as these thinkers challenge the foundational computational and elitist assumptions often underlying such technologies. Based &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/ai-enactment-and-democratic-self-governance/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI, Enactment, and Democratic Self-Governance"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Functionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reductionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract: This article discuss the epistemology of modeling and simulations, positioning them not merely as descriptive tools, but as crucial heuristic devices and active epistemological practices central to developing a comprehensive, enacted approach to cognition and self-understanding. This focus is situated within the larger framework of Second-Order Rationality² and the integration of first-person (1P) &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/epistemology-of-modeling-cognition-and-self-understanding/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Epistemology of Modeling, Cognition, and Self-Understanding"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; For a long time, the dominant metaphor for the mind has been that of a computer—a complex information processor housed inside the skull, receiving inputs from the senses and producing behavioral outputs. This image of a &#8220;brain in a vat&#8221; has shaped not only science fiction but also much of our everyday thinking about &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Use AI to Empower Democracy? (ChatGPT answer, POC)</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/how-to-use-ai-to-empower-democracy-chatgpt-answer-poc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MachineLearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technopolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Question How can we use PDP (Parallel Distributed Processing) AI / “machine learning” techs to strengthen democratic individual collective intelligence and counter the excessive self-destructive and convergent path (fascism) of global neoliberal capitalism ? ChatGPT answer Great — love this question. I’ll answer in three parts: (A) how the PDP/connectionist paradigm maps onto collective &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/how-to-use-ai-to-empower-democracy-chatgpt-answer-poc/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "How to Use AI to Empower Democracy? (ChatGPT answer, POC)"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organology and Its Critiques: From Aristotle to Stiegler, Hui, and Rigon</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/organology-and-its-critiques-from-aristotle-to-stiegler-hui-and-rigon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@> Abstract This article explores the evolving concept of organology, tracing its philosophical journey from Aristotle’s foundational ideas through Bernard Stiegler’s general organology and Yuk Hui’s cosmotechnics, culminating in Christophe Rigon’s scybernethic critique of scientific &#8220;anthropo-functionalism.&#8221; By examining how each thinker redefines the relationship between biological, technical, and social organs, the article highlights the importance &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/organology-and-its-critiques-from-aristotle-to-stiegler-hui-and-rigon/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Organology and Its Critiques: From Aristotle to Stiegler, Hui, and Rigon"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
