<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non classé Archives - Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/scybernetics-category/non-classe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/scybernetics-category/non-classe/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>AI Machines &#038; Recursivity</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Elaborated with the help of a LLM) Auto-research, Meta-harness, and the New Universal Grammar of Optimization From machines that speak to machines that do First there was the machine that speaks.The spectacle of a disembodied LLM voice, fluent and compliant, answering everything and nothing in the same tone. Now we have entered the age of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/ai-machines-recursivity/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "AI Machines &#38; Recursivity"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computationalPhenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract This short article synthesizes a philosophical and scientific dialogue bridging phenomenology, ecological psychology, enactive cognitive science, and formal neural modeling with key conceptual articulations. We examine how Merleau-Ponty’s concept of motor intentionality—the pre-reflective, embodied orientation of the subject toward the world—reconfigures the movement/consciousness relation, aligns with Gibson’s affordance theory, and finds computational resonance &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Enactive Paradigm and Scybernethics: Towards a Second-Order Scientific Revolution</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/the-enactive-paradigm-and-scybernethics-towards-a-second-order-scientific-revolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The enactive paradigm of cognition represents a significant shift in our understanding of how organisms interact with and make sense of their world. This blog post explores the key epistemological characteristics of enactivism and introduces scybernethics as a valuable extension of this framework, highlighting the methodological consequences that point towards a scientific revolution &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/the-enactive-paradigm-and-scybernethics-towards-a-second-order-scientific-revolution/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Enactive Paradigm and Scybernethics: Towards a Second-Order Scientific Revolution"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the Landscape of Enactive Biocognition: A Comparative Analysis of FEP/PP, Neurophenomenology, Micro-Phenomenology, and Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/navigating-the-landscape-of-enactive-biocognition-a-comparative-analysis-of-fep-pp-neurophenomenology-micro-phenomenology-and-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biocognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CognitiveScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEP-PP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro-phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onto-Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract This article presents a comparative analysis of four prominent approaches to understanding biocognition from an enactive perspective: the Free Energy Principle/Predictive Processing (FEP/PP) model, neurophenomenology, micro-phenomenology, and scybernethics. Each framework offers unique insights into the nature of cognition, consciousness, and the relationship between subjective experience and objective measurement. By examining their methodologies, theoretical &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/navigating-the-landscape-of-enactive-biocognition-a-comparative-analysis-of-fep-pp-neurophenomenology-micro-phenomenology-and-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Navigating the Landscape of Enactive Biocognition: A Comparative Analysis of FEP/PP, Neurophenomenology, Micro-Phenomenology, and Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 06:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kahneman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In the realm of cognitive science and decision-making, Daniel Kahneman&#8217;s dual processing system theory has been a cornerstone for understanding human thought processes. However, Christophe Rigon&#8217;s scybernethics approach offers a novel perspective that not only complements but potentially transcends Kahneman&#8217;s model. This article explores how scybernethics could be viewed as the development of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Number That a Man May Know and a Man That May Know a Number</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/a-number-that-a-man-may-know-and-a-man-that-may-know-a-number/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybernetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCulloch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction Warren McCulloch&#8216;s seminal 1961 essay, &#8220;What is a Number, that a Man May Know It, and a Man that He May Know a Number?&#8220;, laid the groundwork for what would later be recognized as second-order cybernetics[1]. This profound question continues to resonate within the fields of cognitive science, cybernetics, and philosophy of mind. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/a-number-that-a-man-may-know-and-a-man-that-may-know-a-number/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "A Number That a Man May Know and a Man That May Know a Number"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-membering and Un-forgetting: Memory, Anamnesia, and the Sciences of Cognition</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/re-membering-and-un-forgetting-memory-anamnesia-and-the-sciences-of-cognition/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anamnesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; A Historical Echo of Memory and Forgetting The concepts of memory and forgetting, or anamnesis, have echoed through the corridors of human thought for millennia, inspiring philosophers, artists, and scientists alike. From Plato&#8217;s theory of recollection to Nietzsche&#8217;s concept of eternal recurrence or Bergson&#8217;s concept of durée, the interplay between remembering and forgetting has &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/re-membering-and-un-forgetting-memory-anamnesia-and-the-sciences-of-cognition/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Re-membering and Un-forgetting: Memory, Anamnesia, and the Sciences of Cognition"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being and Becoming Non-Inhuman</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/being-and-becoming-non-inhuman/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ana-Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being-Becoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Existential enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Inhuman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; In the twilight of our technological era, we find ourselves at the precipice of a new understanding of humanity—one that challenges the very foundations of our self-conception. As we gaze into the abyss of our own creation, we are compelled to ask: What does it mean to be human in an age where the &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/being-and-becoming-non-inhuman/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Being and Becoming Non-Inhuman"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>De-Construction: Derrida, Stiegler and Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/de-construction-derrida-stiegler-and-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De-construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmakology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stiegler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techno-philosophy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The relationship between Scybernethics de-construction, Derrida&#8217;s deconstruction, and Stiegler&#8217;s techno-philosophy can be understood as a profound interplay of critical thought, recursive logic, and the exploration of conceptual dipoles. Scybernethics, with its emphasis on second-order rationality (logic²), resonates strongly with Derrida’s deconstruction of binary oppositions and Stiegler’s rethinking of technics as constitutive of human &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/de-construction-derrida-stiegler-and-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "De-Construction: Derrida, Stiegler and Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing First and Second-Order Rationality</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/comparing-first-and-second-order-rationality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Order Cybernetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction Christophe Rigon’s concept of second-order rationality in scybernethics represents a significant departure from first-order rationality, offering a more nuanced, reflexive, and processual understanding of cognition and knowledge-making. Below are the key distinctions: First-Order Rationality Second-Order Rationality Rigon’s second-order rationality (rationality²) builds upon and critiques first-order approaches by integrating reflexivity, embodiment, and existential concerns. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/comparing-first-and-second-order-rationality/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Comparing First and Second-Order Rationality"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
