<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scybernethics Archives - Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/tag/scybernethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/tag/scybernethics/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 07:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; For a long time, the dominant metaphor for the mind has been that of a computer—a complex information processor housed inside the skull, receiving inputs from the senses and producing behavioral outputs. This image of a &#8220;brain in a vat&#8221; has shaped not only science fiction but also much of our everyday thinking about &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/your-mind-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-4-revelations-from-the-frontiers-of-cognitive-science/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Your Mind Isn&#8217;t What You Think It Is: 4 Revelations from the Frontiers of Cognitive Science"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computationalPhenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract This short article synthesizes a philosophical and scientific dialogue bridging phenomenology, ecological psychology, enactive cognitive science, and formal neural modeling with key conceptual articulations. We examine how Merleau-Ponty’s concept of motor intentionality—the pre-reflective, embodied orientation of the subject toward the world—reconfigures the movement/consciousness relation, aligns with Gibson’s affordance theory, and finds computational resonance &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/from-phenomenological-motricity-to-enactive-cognition-movement-sense-making-and-neural-modeling/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "From Phenomenological Motricity to Enactive Cognition: Movement, Sense-Making, and Neural Modeling"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Enactive Paradigm and Scybernethics: Towards a Second-Order Scientific Revolution</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/the-enactive-paradigm-and-scybernethics-towards-a-second-order-scientific-revolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The enactive paradigm of cognition represents a significant shift in our understanding of how organisms interact with and make sense of their world. This blog post explores the key epistemological characteristics of enactivism and introduces scybernethics as a valuable extension of this framework, highlighting the methodological consequences that point towards a scientific revolution &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/the-enactive-paradigm-and-scybernethics-towards-a-second-order-scientific-revolution/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Enactive Paradigm and Scybernethics: Towards a Second-Order Scientific Revolution"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the Landscape of Enactive Biocognition: A Comparative Analysis of FEP/PP, Neurophenomenology, Micro-Phenomenology, and Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/navigating-the-landscape-of-enactive-biocognition-a-comparative-analysis-of-fep-pp-neurophenomenology-micro-phenomenology-and-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biocognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CognitiveScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEP-PP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro-phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onto-Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Abstract This article presents a comparative analysis of four prominent approaches to understanding biocognition from an enactive perspective: the Free Energy Principle/Predictive Processing (FEP/PP) model, neurophenomenology, micro-phenomenology, and scybernethics. Each framework offers unique insights into the nature of cognition, consciousness, and the relationship between subjective experience and objective measurement. By examining their methodologies, theoretical &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/navigating-the-landscape-of-enactive-biocognition-a-comparative-analysis-of-fep-pp-neurophenomenology-micro-phenomenology-and-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Navigating the Landscape of Enactive Biocognition: A Comparative Analysis of FEP/PP, Neurophenomenology, Micro-Phenomenology, and Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 06:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kahneman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In the realm of cognitive science and decision-making, Daniel Kahneman&#8217;s dual processing system theory has been a cornerstone for understanding human thought processes. However, Christophe Rigon&#8217;s scybernethics approach offers a novel perspective that not only complements but potentially transcends Kahneman&#8217;s model. This article explores how scybernethics could be viewed as the development of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Number That a Man May Know and a Man That May Know a Number</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/a-number-that-a-man-may-know-and-a-man-that-may-know-a-number/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybernetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCulloch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction Warren McCulloch&#8216;s seminal 1961 essay, &#8220;What is a Number, that a Man May Know It, and a Man that He May Know a Number?&#8220;, laid the groundwork for what would later be recognized as second-order cybernetics[1]. This profound question continues to resonate within the fields of cognitive science, cybernetics, and philosophy of mind. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/a-number-that-a-man-may-know-and-a-man-that-may-know-a-number/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "A Number That a Man May Know and a Man That May Know a Number"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-membering and Un-forgetting: Memory, Anamnesia, and the Sciences of Cognition</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/re-membering-and-un-forgetting-memory-anamnesia-and-the-sciences-of-cognition/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anamnesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; A Historical Echo of Memory and Forgetting The concepts of memory and forgetting, or anamnesis, have echoed through the corridors of human thought for millennia, inspiring philosophers, artists, and scientists alike. From Plato&#8217;s theory of recollection to Nietzsche&#8217;s concept of eternal recurrence or Bergson&#8217;s concept of durée, the interplay between remembering and forgetting has &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/re-membering-and-un-forgetting-memory-anamnesia-and-the-sciences-of-cognition/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Re-membering and Un-forgetting: Memory, Anamnesia, and the Sciences of Cognition"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art of &#8220;Com-putation&#8221;: Intuition, Balance, and Second-Order Logic</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/the-art-of-com-putation-intuition-balance-and-second-order-logic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Metacrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aesthetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BidimenTionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Com-putation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computational-Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enkinaesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomenology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In our fast-paced world, we&#8217;re constantly bombarded with information and decisions. How do we make sense of it all? In scybernethics, we explore this question by diving deep into the heart of what we call &#8220;com-putation,&#8221; a process that goes far beyond mere calculation. It’s an embodied, intuitive approach to meaning-making that involves &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/the-art-of-com-putation-intuition-balance-and-second-order-logic/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Art of &#8220;Com-putation&#8221;: Intuition, Balance, and Second-Order Logic"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>De-Construction: Derrida, Stiegler and Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/de-construction-derrida-stiegler-and-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De-construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmakology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stiegler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techno-philosophy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction The relationship between Scybernethics de-construction, Derrida&#8217;s deconstruction, and Stiegler&#8217;s techno-philosophy can be understood as a profound interplay of critical thought, recursive logic, and the exploration of conceptual dipoles. Scybernethics, with its emphasis on second-order rationality (logic²), resonates strongly with Derrida’s deconstruction of binary oppositions and Stiegler’s rethinking of technics as constitutive of human &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/de-construction-derrida-stiegler-and-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "De-Construction: Derrida, Stiegler and Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring Scyberspace: A New Framework for Cognition, Mathematics, and Ethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/exploring-scyberspace-a-new-framework-for-cognition-mathematics-and-ethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CognitiveScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitve Sciences and Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In this article, we explore the concept of scyberspace, a novel representational framework that integrates first-person and third-person epistemologies to study cognition, meaning-making, and recursive dynamics. Drawing inspiration from diverse fields such as geometry, topology, enactivism, and computational paradigms, scyberspace offers a powerful tool for bridging classical and modern approaches to understanding cognition. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/exploring-scyberspace-a-new-framework-for-cognition-mathematics-and-ethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Exploring Scyberspace: A New Framework for Cognition, Mathematics, and Ethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
