<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Meta-Dualism Archives - Scybernethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scybernethics.org/tag/meta-dualism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scybernethics.org/tag/meta-dualism/</link>
	<description>Enacting a Knowing &#38; Enlivening Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 06:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kahneman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-order rationality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=49340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction In the realm of cognitive science and decision-making, Daniel Kahneman&#8217;s dual processing system theory has been a cornerstone for understanding human thought processes. However, Christophe Rigon&#8217;s scybernethics approach offers a novel perspective that not only complements but potentially transcends Kahneman&#8217;s model. This article explores how scybernethics could be viewed as the development of &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/complex-decision-making-from-dual-processing-to-scybernethics/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Complex Decision-making: From Dual Processing to Scybernethics"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reframing the Mind-Body Problem: A Meta-Dualist Approach</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/reframing-the-mind-body-problem-a-meta-dualist-approach/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computational-Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakendoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind-Body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind-Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varela]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; &#8220;There is really not a mind-body problem. There is a mind-mind problem.&#8221; &#8211; Varela, &#8220;God &#38; Computers: Minds, Machines, and Metaphysics&#8220;, MIT A.I. Lab 1997. Introduction The meta-dualist conceptions of both Scybernethics and Varela&#8217;s cybernetic dialectic have significant consequences for how the mind-body problem is understood, ultimately reframing it as a &#8220;mind-mind&#8221; problem centered &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/reframing-the-mind-body-problem-a-meta-dualist-approach/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Reframing the Mind-Body Problem: A Meta-Dualist Approach"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overcoming Dualism (Meta-Dualism): Comparing Scybernethics and Varela&#8217;s Cybernetic Dialectic</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/overcoming-dualism-meta-dualism-comparing-scybernethics-and-varelas-cybernetic-dialectic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 09:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialectics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varela]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[°°°°~x§x-&#60;@&#62; Introduction Scybernethics and Varela&#8217;s &#8220;cybernetic dialectic&#8221; (Bitbol 2021) both address conceptual dualities, but they do so with different emphases and methodologies. Scybernethics, developed by Christophe Rigon, is an approach that emphasizes a practical, embodied, and self-transformative method of inquiry, while Varela&#8217;s cybernetic dialectic, particularly as expressed in &#8220;Not one, not two,&#8221; (Varela 1976) is &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/overcoming-dualism-meta-dualism-comparing-scybernethics-and-varelas-cybernetic-dialectic/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Overcoming Dualism (Meta-Dualism): Comparing Scybernethics and Varela&#8217;s Cybernetic Dialectic"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extending our Understanding with Conceptual Dipoles</title>
		<link>https://scybernethics.org/extending-our-understanding-with-conceptual-dipoles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soto²]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conceptual-Dipoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scybernethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second-Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scybernethics.org/?p=48725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Conceptual Dipoles in Scybernethics Conceptual dipoles are a key element of the scybernethics framework, serving as a tool for analysis and understanding, and playing a practical role in the scybernethics methodological inquiry. Definition and Nature Practical Role in Scybernethics Methodology Relations to Key Scybernethics Concepts: In summary, conceptual dipoles are a central tool in scybernethics &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://scybernethics.org/extending-our-understanding-with-conceptual-dipoles/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Extending our Understanding with Conceptual Dipoles"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
